|
Materials In Vacuum
Kurt Feltenberger
(01 Nov 2017 02:03 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Materials In Vacuum
Tim
(01 Nov 2017 03:34 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Materials In Vacuum
Grimmund
(01 Nov 2017 13:55 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Materials In Vacuum
Bruce Johnson
(01 Nov 2017 16:04 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Materials In Vacuum
C. Berry
(01 Nov 2017 17:51 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Materials In Vacuum
C. Berry
(01 Nov 2017 21:27 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Materials In Vacuum
Kelly St. Clair
(01 Nov 2017 23:49 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Materials In Vacuum
Richard Aiken
(02 Nov 2017 05:15 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Materials In Vacuum
Kelly St. Clair
(02 Nov 2017 06:52 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Materials In Vacuum
C. Berry
(02 Nov 2017 19:52 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Materials In Vacuum
C. Berry
(02 Nov 2017 19:48 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Materials In Vacuum
Rupert Boleyn
(02 Nov 2017 23:27 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Materials In Vacuum
Rupert Boleyn
(02 Nov 2017 23:23 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Materials In Vacuum
C. Berry
(02 Nov 2017 23:48 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Materials In Vacuum
shadow@xxxxxx
(04 Nov 2017 21:38 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Materials In Vacuum Bruce Johnson (06 Nov 2017 14:34 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Materials In Vacuum
Grimmund
(08 Nov 2017 19:41 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Materials In Vacuum
shadow@xxxxxx
(09 Nov 2017 11:37 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Materials In Vacuum
shadow@xxxxxx
(04 Nov 2017 21:38 UTC)
|
> On Nov 4, 2017, at 2:37 PM, (via tml list) <xxxxxx@simplelists.com> wrote: > > So the choice between neon, argon, krypton and xenon will be a > balance between higher molecular weight and cheaper to get in the > volumes required. Nitrogen is vastly more abundant than any of them, and close enough to inert for these purposes. -- Bruce Johnson University of Arizona College of Pharmacy Information Technology Group Institutions do not have opinions, merely customs
