HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Timothy Collinson (10 May 2018 14:27 UTC)
Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Richard Aiken (10 May 2018 19:31 UTC)
Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Timothy Collinson (10 May 2018 22:45 UTC)
Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Michael Houghton (10 May 2018 20:18 UTC)
Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Timothy Collinson (10 May 2018 22:43 UTC)
Re: [Spam] Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Cheng Tseng (11 May 2018 03:49 UTC)
Re: [Spam] Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Timothy Collinson (11 May 2018 05:34 UTC)
Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Thomas RUX (11 May 2018 13:52 UTC)
Re: [Spam] Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Phil Pugliese (11 May 2018 17:18 UTC)
Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Phil Pugliese (11 May 2018 17:07 UTC)
Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Postmark (11 May 2018 23:10 UTC)
Re[2]: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Cheng Tseng (12 May 2018 03:48 UTC)
Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Phil Pugliese (12 May 2018 21:59 UTC)
Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Rupert Boleyn (13 May 2018 00:09 UTC)
Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Richard Aiken (15 May 2018 02:54 UTC)
Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Rupert Boleyn (15 May 2018 22:19 UTC)
Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Richard Aiken (16 May 2018 01:28 UTC)
Re[2]: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Cheng Tseng (16 May 2018 03:25 UTC)
Re: Re[2]: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Richard Aiken (16 May 2018 03:50 UTC)
Re: Re[2]: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Graham Donald (16 May 2018 06:32 UTC)
Re: Re[2]: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Phil Pugliese (16 May 2018 19:05 UTC)
Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Rupert Boleyn (18 May 2018 11:53 UTC)
Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Phil Pugliese (18 May 2018 20:13 UTC)
Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Richard Aiken (19 May 2018 02:32 UTC)
Re: [Spam] Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Cheng Tseng (19 May 2018 03:26 UTC)
Visible lunar detonation Tim (19 May 2018 04:40 UTC)
Re: [TML] Visible lunar detonation Jeffrey Schwartz (04 Jun 2018 15:44 UTC)
Re: [Spam] Re: [TML] Visible lunar detonation Cheng Tseng (05 Jun 2018 03:08 UTC)
Re: [Spam] Re: [TML] Visible lunar detonation Catherine Berry (05 Jun 2018 04:18 UTC)
Re: [Spam] Re: [TML] Visible lunar detonation Kelly St. Clair (05 Jun 2018 06:19 UTC)
Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Jeff Zeitlin (19 May 2018 15:05 UTC)
Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Richard Aiken (20 May 2018 23:53 UTC)
Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Rupert Boleyn (12 May 2018 11:09 UTC)
Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Catherine Berry (10 May 2018 20:33 UTC)
Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier shadow97218@xxxxxx (11 May 2018 15:35 UTC)

Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier shadow97218@xxxxxx 11 May 2018 15:35 UTC

On 10 May 2018 at 20:32, Catherine Berry wrote:

>     the waste disposal system broke down because people kept putting
>     metal items in the non-metal bins etc.

There's a nice rant about that in Bujpold's Ethan of Athos". Improper
recycliong on a space station can cause major problems.

 > Hitting a small piece of debris at orbital speeds, never mind
> constant-multi-g-thrust transit speeds, can cause spectacular damage.
> This has already taken out a number of satellites in real life, and
> it's a constant worry for ISS. Any remotely civilized system will have
> absolutely draconian anti-space-littering regulations. I can easily
> picture being convicted of a capital crime for negligently letting an
> untethered wrench drift away from your ship. I just realized that in
> the wake of a failed pirate attack where the pirates get captured, it
> might be a tossup whether the more serious charge against them would
> be attempted piracy, or creating a navigational hazard for knocking
> pieces off the target ship. :)

James White had that in his book "Deadly Litter". Alas, he didn't
understand the idea of "escape velocity" so he had high speed litter
in *orbits* where it kept returning.

But yeah, STC (Space Traffic Control) is gonna be keeping an eye on
that sort of thing. It's another reason why you are never allowed a
vector that will intersect anything important (bot if you maintain
acceleration or if you cut acceleration)