HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Timothy Collinson (10 May 2018 14:27 UTC)
Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Richard Aiken (10 May 2018 19:31 UTC)
Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Timothy Collinson (10 May 2018 22:45 UTC)
Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Michael Houghton (10 May 2018 20:18 UTC)
Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Timothy Collinson (10 May 2018 22:43 UTC)
Re: [Spam] Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Cheng Tseng (11 May 2018 03:49 UTC)
Re: [Spam] Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Timothy Collinson (11 May 2018 05:34 UTC)
Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Thomas RUX (11 May 2018 13:52 UTC)
Re: [Spam] Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Phil Pugliese (11 May 2018 17:18 UTC)
Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Phil Pugliese (11 May 2018 17:07 UTC)
Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Postmark (11 May 2018 23:10 UTC)
Re[2]: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Cheng Tseng (12 May 2018 03:48 UTC)
Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Phil Pugliese (12 May 2018 21:59 UTC)
Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Rupert Boleyn (13 May 2018 00:09 UTC)
Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Richard Aiken (15 May 2018 02:54 UTC)
Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Rupert Boleyn (15 May 2018 22:19 UTC)
Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Richard Aiken (16 May 2018 01:28 UTC)
Re[2]: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Cheng Tseng (16 May 2018 03:25 UTC)
Re: Re[2]: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Richard Aiken (16 May 2018 03:50 UTC)
Re: Re[2]: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Graham Donald (16 May 2018 06:32 UTC)
Re: Re[2]: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Phil Pugliese (16 May 2018 19:05 UTC)
Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Rupert Boleyn (18 May 2018 11:53 UTC)
Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Phil Pugliese (18 May 2018 20:13 UTC)
Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Richard Aiken (19 May 2018 02:32 UTC)
Re: [Spam] Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Cheng Tseng (19 May 2018 03:26 UTC)
Visible lunar detonation Tim (19 May 2018 04:40 UTC)
Re: [TML] Visible lunar detonation Jeffrey Schwartz (04 Jun 2018 15:44 UTC)
Re: [Spam] Re: [TML] Visible lunar detonation Cheng Tseng (05 Jun 2018 03:08 UTC)
Re: [Spam] Re: [TML] Visible lunar detonation Catherine Berry (05 Jun 2018 04:18 UTC)
Re: [Spam] Re: [TML] Visible lunar detonation Kelly St. Clair (05 Jun 2018 06:19 UTC)
Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Jeff Zeitlin (19 May 2018 15:05 UTC)
Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Richard Aiken (20 May 2018 23:53 UTC)
Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Rupert Boleyn (12 May 2018 11:09 UTC)
Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier Catherine Berry (10 May 2018 20:33 UTC)
Re: [TML] HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier shadow97218@xxxxxx (11 May 2018 15:35 UTC)

Re: [TML] Visible lunar detonation Jeffrey Schwartz 04 Jun 2018 15:43 UTC

On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 12:40 AM, Tim <xxxxxx@little-possums.net> wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 11:26:17PM -0400, Cheng Tseng wrote:
>> Now back to determining how powerful a nuclear weapon has to be so
>> that the detonation on the Moon (And any after effects.) can be seen
>> from Earth...
>
> The first part is trivial.  Pretty much any nuclear detonation above
> the surface on the near side will be visible from Earth by anyone
> looking in the right direction at night.  A large one would likely be
> visible during the day.  It would require an enormously larger weapon
> than anything we have now to leave a crater visible from Earth with
> even good telescopes, though.  Perhaps one detonating well above the
> surface might discolour it over a wide enough area to be visible.
>

I wonder what would happen if you had some Claymore-mine style thing
on the front of a drone heading at the Moon at 12KPS...
Set the mine off several miles above the surface, and spread the
pellets over a larger area, then let them hit and churn up the dust.

Would the churned up area be large enough to be noticed?