On the testing bandwagon... Joseph Paul (30 Apr 2014 15:41 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Peter Berghold (30 Apr 2014 15:43 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Joseph Paul (30 Apr 2014 17:38 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Greg Nokes (30 Apr 2014 18:19 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Knapp (01 May 2014 06:58 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Eris Reddoch (01 May 2014 21:01 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Freelance Traveller (01 May 2014 22:51 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Andrew Long (01 May 2014 23:17 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Bruce Johnson (01 May 2014 23:28 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Knapp (02 May 2014 19:07 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Phil Pugliese (02 May 2014 19:37 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Knapp (02 May 2014 19:49 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Timothy Collinson (02 May 2014 21:44 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Phil Pugliese (02 May 2014 22:44 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Ros Knox & Michael Barry (03 May 2014 08:14 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Timothy Collinson (04 May 2014 10:55 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Knapp (04 May 2014 15:53 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Phil Pugliese (04 May 2014 17:46 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Knapp (04 May 2014 18:45 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Carlos (03 May 2014 10:24 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Phil Pugliese (02 May 2014 21:47 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Bruce Johnson (01 May 2014 23:34 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... shadow@xxxxxx (02 May 2014 01:19 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Tim (02 May 2014 06:01 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Phil Pugliese (02 May 2014 10:11 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Carlos (02 May 2014 12:01 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Timothy Collinson (02 May 2014 19:23 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... shadow@xxxxxx (03 May 2014 06:41 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Ros Knox & Michael Barry (03 May 2014 07:33 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Phil Pugliese (03 May 2014 15:46 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Carlos (03 May 2014 16:14 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Phil Pugliese (03 May 2014 16:51 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... shadow@xxxxxx (04 May 2014 04:41 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Richard Aiken (04 May 2014 06:37 UTC)
Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Richard Aiken (02 May 2014 06:22 UTC)

Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon... Phil Pugliese 02 May 2014 10:11 UTC

What do folks do way up north where you get really, really short days in the winter & really, really long ones in summer?
I'm thinking that it could be something like that...

p.s. I worked 'graveyard' for almost 30 years. As a result it's much harder for me to sleep at night than during the day but I rarely sleep more than 4-5 hours at once (sometimes only three). But I do find that I need more than that much sleep in a 24 hour period. Hence there's almost always more than than one 'sleeping cycle' per 24 hour period.
Also, years ago there was an article in National Geographic about a scientist that went to live isolated underground in a big cave w/ no timekeeping devices. After a while her waking/sleeping cycles fluctuated wildly...

--------------------------------------------
On Thu, 5/1/14, Tim <tim@little-possums.net> wrote:

 Subject: Re: [TML] On the testing bandwagon...
 To: tml@simplelists.com
 Date: Thursday, May 1, 2014, 11:01 PM

 On Thu, May 01, 2014 at
 06:51:18PM -0400, Freelance Traveller wrote:
 > Where the local astronomical year
 doesn't match up with the Imperial
 >
 year, a local calendar may be considered more important than
 the
 > Imperial one

 Yes, and that's going to be true
 essentially everywhere.  The chance
 of any
 planet having exactly the same day and year length as any
 particular standard will be negligible.  Even
 with the possibility of
 mega-engineering
 projects, the energy of rotation for a whole planet
 is astronomical.  (Much more so for altering
 the orbit)