Cool new Traveller tech in production Grimmund (08 May 2014 18:48 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production Kurt Feltenberger (08 May 2014 18:55 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production Jeffrey Schwartz (08 May 2014 20:09 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production Bruce Johnson (08 May 2014 21:33 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production Ian Whitchurch (08 May 2014 21:59 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production Phil Pugliese (08 May 2014 22:34 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production Bruce Johnson (08 May 2014 23:05 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production Richard Aiken (09 May 2014 04:00 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production Richard Aiken (09 May 2014 04:03 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production Richard Aiken (09 May 2014 04:36 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production Jeffrey Schwartz (09 May 2014 13:00 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production Knapp (09 May 2014 20:19 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production W. Hopper (10 May 2014 16:15 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production Knapp (10 May 2014 21:06 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production Phil Pugliese (09 May 2014 10:28 UTC)

Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production Bruce Johnson 08 May 2014 23:05 UTC

On May 8, 2014, at 3:34 PM, Phil Pugliese (via tml list) <xxxxxx@simplelists.com> wrote:

> Of course, for certain 'ambush' scenarios I suppose weapons could be used similarly to the way claymores are deployed, only w/ a lot better situatonal awareness. I would still prefer a cord option. Well-shielded of course.

I rather think that firing a FGMP or PGMP kinda fubars wireless radio comms anyway.

--
Bruce Johnson
University of Arizona
College of Pharmacy
Information Technology Group

Institutions do not have opinions, merely customs