Cool new Traveller tech in production Grimmund (08 May 2014 18:48 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production Kurt Feltenberger (08 May 2014 18:55 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production Jeffrey Schwartz (08 May 2014 20:09 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production Bruce Johnson (08 May 2014 21:33 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production Ian Whitchurch (08 May 2014 21:59 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production Phil Pugliese (08 May 2014 22:34 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production Bruce Johnson (08 May 2014 23:05 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production Richard Aiken (09 May 2014 04:00 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production Richard Aiken (09 May 2014 04:03 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production Richard Aiken (09 May 2014 04:36 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production Jeffrey Schwartz (09 May 2014 13:00 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production Knapp (09 May 2014 20:19 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production W. Hopper (10 May 2014 16:15 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production Knapp (10 May 2014 21:06 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production Phil Pugliese (09 May 2014 10:28 UTC)

Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production Phil Pugliese 09 May 2014 10:28 UTC

--------------------------------------------
On Thu, 5/8/14, Bruce Johnson <xxxxxx@Pharmacy.Arizona.EDU> wrote:

 Subject: Re: [TML] Cool new Traveller tech in production
 To: "xxxxxx@simplelists.com" <xxxxxx@simplelists.com>
 Date: Thursday, May 8, 2014, 4:05 PM

 On May
 8, 2014, at 3:34 PM, Phil Pugliese (via tml list) <xxxxxx@simplelists.com>
 wrote:

 > Of course, for
 certain 'ambush' scenarios I suppose weapons could
 be used similarly to the way claymores are deployed, only w/
 a lot better situatonal awareness. I would still prefer a
 cord option. Well-shielded of course.

 I rather think that firing a FGMP or PGMP kinda
 fubars wireless radio comms anyway.

 -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------

Good point, I suppose that commo would 'come & go' & the trooper/s would have to use a lot of individual initiative esp if a squad got split up.
Come to think of it maybe the squad would always be 'split up' considering the amount of firepower avail to an individual at those TL's..