Question Leslie Bates (15 Jun 2015 19:47 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Bruce Johnson (15 Jun 2015 20:01 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Ethan McKinney (15 Jun 2015 20:19 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Greg Chalik (15 Jun 2015 22:05 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Richard Aiken (15 Jun 2015 22:18 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Phil Pugliese (16 Jun 2015 04:54 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Richard Aiken (16 Jun 2015 05:04 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Phil Pugliese (16 Jun 2015 04:49 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Richard Aiken (15 Jun 2015 22:07 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question shadow@xxxxxx (16 Jun 2015 07:01 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Phil Pugliese (16 Jun 2015 11:49 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question shadow@xxxxxx (16 Jun 2015 22:42 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Leslie Bates (16 Jun 2015 07:01 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Richard Aiken (16 Jun 2015 07:13 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Richard Aiken (16 Jun 2015 07:25 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Bruce Johnson (16 Jun 2015 17:19 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Phil Pugliese (16 Jun 2015 19:42 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Grimmund (16 Jun 2015 20:08 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Phil Pugliese (16 Jun 2015 20:48 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Kurt Feltenberger (17 Jun 2015 00:22 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Greg Chalik (17 Jun 2015 00:53 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Phil Pugliese (17 Jun 2015 01:59 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Greg Chalik (17 Jun 2015 05:10 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Richard Aiken (17 Jun 2015 05:18 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Greg Chalik (17 Jun 2015 06:19 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Richard Aiken (17 Jun 2015 08:06 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Greg Chalik (18 Jun 2015 01:44 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Phil Pugliese (17 Jun 2015 13:52 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Phil Pugliese (17 Jun 2015 13:32 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Greg Chalik (18 Jun 2015 02:17 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Grimmund (16 Jun 2015 20:12 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Bruce Johnson (16 Jun 2015 21:36 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Colin Paddock (17 Jun 2015 00:07 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Kurt Feltenberger (17 Jun 2015 00:24 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Phil Pugliese (17 Jun 2015 01:54 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Greg Chalik (17 Jun 2015 03:52 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Phil Pugliese (17 Jun 2015 11:59 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Greg Chalik (18 Jun 2015 02:09 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Phil Pugliese (17 Jun 2015 01:43 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Greg Chalik (17 Jun 2015 03:28 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Phil Pugliese (17 Jun 2015 11:48 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Bruce Johnson (17 Jun 2015 16:12 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Phil Pugliese (17 Jun 2015 19:05 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Kelly St. Clair (18 Jun 2015 00:30 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Bruce Johnson (18 Jun 2015 01:33 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Kelly St. Clair (18 Jun 2015 15:57 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Bruce Johnson (18 Jun 2015 16:18 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Phil Pugliese (19 Jun 2015 13:16 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Joseph Paul (18 Jun 2015 16:58 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Joseph Paul (18 Jun 2015 17:35 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Richard Aiken (18 Jun 2015 22:22 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Brad Rogers (19 Jun 2015 05:26 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Richard Aiken (19 Jun 2015 07:03 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Knapp (19 Jun 2015 07:58 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Richard Aiken (19 Jun 2015 09:55 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Knapp (19 Jun 2015 10:44 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Greg Chalik (19 Jun 2015 11:35 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Richard Aiken (20 Jun 2015 07:38 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Phil Pugliese (19 Jun 2015 13:48 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Bruce Johnson (19 Jun 2015 16:51 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question tmr0195@xxxxxx (19 Jun 2015 21:36 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Knapp (19 Jun 2015 21:43 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Bruce Johnson (19 Jun 2015 22:38 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question tmr0195@xxxxxx (20 Jun 2015 05:46 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Greg Chalik (20 Jun 2015 04:48 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Bruce Johnson (20 Jun 2015 15:46 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Greg Chalik (21 Jun 2015 00:19 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Phil Pugliese (21 Jun 2015 02:52 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Brad Rogers (19 Jun 2015 10:27 UTC)
Formats [WAS: Re: [TML] Question] Greg Nokes (19 Jun 2015 13:19 UTC)
Re: Formats [WAS: Re: [TML] Question] Richard Aiken (20 Jun 2015 07:20 UTC)
Re: Formats [WAS: Re: [TML] Question] Greg Nokes (22 Jun 2015 00:01 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Grimmund (19 Jun 2015 13:17 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Richard Aiken (20 Jun 2015 08:06 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Richard Aiken (20 Jun 2015 08:11 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Grimmund (21 Jun 2015 12:59 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Greg Chalik (21 Jun 2015 04:19 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Greg Chalik (21 Jun 2015 03:50 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Richard Aiken (21 Jun 2015 04:01 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Joseph Paul (21 Jun 2015 22:31 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question rupert.boleyn@xxxxxx (22 Jun 2015 00:01 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Joseph Paul (22 Jun 2015 02:32 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Greg Chalik (22 Jun 2015 03:22 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Phil Pugliese (22 Jun 2015 14:02 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Joseph Paul (29 Jun 2015 06:50 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Greg Chalik (22 Jun 2015 01:43 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Greg Chalik (17 Jun 2015 03:33 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Kurt Feltenberger (17 Jun 2015 03:41 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Phil Pugliese (17 Jun 2015 11:54 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question Kurt Feltenberger (17 Jun 2015 00:20 UTC)

Re: [TML] Question Phil Pugliese 17 Jun 2015 11:59 UTC

I've read in more than one book that original Sherman's had a 75mm gun which was found to be inadequate & was soon replaced w/ the 3" gun.
It was even reflected in some 70's era tactical wargames.
One in particular, as I recall, was 'Tank' published by SPI around 1973, I believe.
I also don't believe that he Sherman was ready to go in 1941.
Weren't we still supplying the Grant/Lee to the brits in 1942?

--------------------------------------------
On Tue, 6/16/15, Greg Chalik <mrg3105@gmail.com> wrote:

 Subject: Re: [TML] Question
 To: "tml@simplelists.com" <tml@simplelists.com>
 Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2015, 8:51 PM

 On 17 June 2015 at 11:54,
 Phil Pugliese (via tml list) <nobody@simplelists.com>
 wrote:
 17pdr
 gun

 ​The M4 did
 not have a wimpy 75mm gun in 1941.
 The Ordnance
 QF 17pdr ​wasn't available until 1943.
 Integrating a
 new weapon into an existing tank design is not what most
 engineers would advise since the costs can be quite
 prohibitive.
 The thinking
 in the US was that the the M26 was going to be ready
 'any day now', which didn't happen.
 The thinking
 in the UK was that the Centurion 'universal' tank
 wasn't going to be ready in time, so a LIMITED
 conversion program was a reasonable accounting risk.
 Israelis faced
 the same choice in the 50s when converting the same Shermans
 to the M50/51 spec.

 Greg

 -----
 The Traveller Mailing List
 Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml
 Report problems to listmom@travellercentral.com
 To unsubscribe from this list please goto
 http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=EwREIRgLK8vaUEhNlnoNdSGKwnjoID8a