Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) affordability Greg Chalik (25 Jun 2015 02:14 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) affordability Greg Chalik (25 Jun 2015 05:38 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) affordability Joseph Paul (25 Jun 2015 14:35 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) affordability Greg Chalik (26 Jun 2015 04:42 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) affordability Greg Chalik (26 Jun 2015 07:20 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) affordability Greg Nokes (26 Jun 2015 18:17 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) affordability Greg Chalik (26 Jun 2015 21:01 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) affordability Joseph Paul (26 Jun 2015 05:57 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) affordability Greg Chalik (26 Jun 2015 09:08 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) affordability Joseph Paul (29 Jun 2015 03:50 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) affordability shadow@xxxxxx (29 Jun 2015 10:52 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) affordability Joseph Paul (30 Jun 2015 05:23 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) affordability shadow@xxxxxx (30 Jun 2015 22:51 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) affordability Joseph Paul (01 Jul 2015 02:35 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) affordability Kurt Feltenberger (01 Jul 2015 02:38 UTC)
USSR is gone but has doctrine changed wrt their successor/s? Phil Pugliese (29 Jun 2015 14:39 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) affordability Greg Chalik (01 Jul 2015 04:43 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) affordability Andrew Long (26 Jun 2015 15:38 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) affordability Greg Chalik (26 Jun 2015 20:50 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) affordability shadow@xxxxxx (26 Jun 2015 16:11 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) affordability Greg Chalik (26 Jun 2015 20:17 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) affordability Ethan McKinney (26 Jun 2015 20:03 UTC)

Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) affordability Kurt Feltenberger 01 Jul 2015 02:37 UTC

On 6/30/2015 10:35 PM, Joseph Paul wrote:
> It looks like Planetary Resources is planning on hitting the NEA,
> primarily because we can't do much more yet. Higher dV rocks will be
> gotten rid of as soon as feasible but that just means that by the time
> you get to Traveller tech it will be routine to clear the asteroids
> that are buzzing where you want traffic to be. Deploying small craft
> to do it (if they are big enough to haul the equipment for that
> endeavour however it is to be accomplished) could be routine until
> they are gone. Don't have the industrial capacity to smelt them all?
> Park them in an orbit that doesn't cross a planet's path..

Parking them at the L4 and L5 points would be pretty much ideal.

--
Kurt Feltenberger
xxxxxx@thepaw.org/xxxxxx@yahoo.com
“Before today, I was scared to live, after today, I'm scared I'm not
living enough." - Me