|
Re: [TML] Instant city
babyduck1
(15 Feb 2016 12:19 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Instant city
Greg Chalik
(16 Feb 2016 10:03 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Instant city
Thomas Jones-Low
(16 Feb 2016 14:07 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Instant city
Greg Chalik
(16 Feb 2016 19:53 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Instant city
shadow@xxxxxx
(21 Feb 2016 00:23 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Instant city
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(16 Feb 2016 14:10 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Instant city
Richard Aiken
(16 Feb 2016 23:36 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Instant city
Craig Berry
(16 Feb 2016 23:44 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Instant city
Jeffrey Schwartz
(17 Feb 2016 14:52 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Instant city
Bruce Johnson
(17 Feb 2016 16:38 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Instant city
Craig Berry
(17 Feb 2016 16:50 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Instant city
Jeffrey Schwartz
(17 Feb 2016 17:04 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Instant city
Craig Berry
(17 Feb 2016 17:17 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Instant city
Bruce Johnson
(17 Feb 2016 17:58 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Instant city
Jeffrey Schwartz
(18 Feb 2016 14:11 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Instant city
Tim
(19 Feb 2016 00:00 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Instant city
shadow@xxxxxx
(21 Feb 2016 02:57 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Instant city Bruce Johnson (17 Feb 2016 17:04 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Instant city
Jeffrey Schwartz
(17 Feb 2016 17:00 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Instant city
shadow@xxxxxx
(21 Feb 2016 02:57 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Instant city
shadow@xxxxxx
(21 Feb 2016 02:57 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Instant city
shadow@xxxxxx
(21 Feb 2016 01:47 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Instant city
Greg Chalik
(17 Feb 2016 01:20 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Instant city
Richard Aiken
(17 Feb 2016 04:15 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Instant city
Greg Chalik
(17 Feb 2016 07:47 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Instant city
Richard Aiken
(17 Feb 2016 12:04 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Instant city
Jeffrey Schwartz
(17 Feb 2016 14:59 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Instant city
Craig Berry
(17 Feb 2016 15:38 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Instant city
shadow@xxxxxx
(21 Feb 2016 02:57 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Instant city
shadow@xxxxxx
(21 Feb 2016 01:47 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Instant city Bruce Johnson 17 Feb 2016 17:04 UTC
> On Feb 17, 2016, at 9:49 AM, Craig Berry <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote: > > Which is why Jump as written is inconsistent with reality as we understand it; since the jump entry and jump exit are separated further in space than in time, there will be observers who see them in either order. Hilarity ensues. :> It’s just all that timey-wimey stuff no one pays attention to anyway 8-) -- Bruce Johnson University of Arizona College of Pharmacy Information Technology Group Institutions do not have opinions, merely customs