Re: [TML] Relic tech and Scarcity-Driven Imperium (was: Salvage Operations (and Submarines))

Show/hide message thread

Relic tech and Scarcity-Driven Imperium (was: Salvage Operations (and Submarines)) carlos.web@xxxxxx (28 Mar 2016 10:36 UTC)

Re: [TML] Relic tech and Scarcity-Driven Imperium (was: Salvage Operations (and Submarines)) Kelly St. Clair (28 Mar 2016 17:55 UTC)

Re: [TML] Relic tech and Scarcity-Driven Imperium (was: Salvage Operations (and Submarines)) Michael McKinney (28 Mar 2016 18:03 UTC)

Re: [TML] Relic tech and Scarcity-Driven Imperium (was: Salvage Operations (and Submarines)) Postmark (28 Mar 2016 22:56 UTC)

Re: [TML] Relic tech and Scarcity-Driven Imperium (was: Salvage Operations (and Submarines)) Tim (28 Mar 2016 23:27 UTC)

Re: [TML] Relic tech and Scarcity-Driven Imperium (was: Salvage Operations (and Submarines)) Michael McKinney (28 Mar 2016 23:37 UTC)

Re: [TML] Relic tech and Scarcity-Driven Imperium (was: Salvage Operations (and Submarines)) Tim (28 Mar 2016 23:52 UTC)

Re: [TML] Relic tech and Scarcity-Driven Imperium (was: Salvage Operations (and Submarines)) Michael McKinney (29 Mar 2016 01:34 UTC)

Re: [TML] Relic tech and Scarcity-Driven Imperium (was: Salvage Operations (and Submarines)) Tim (29 Mar 2016 03:12 UTC)

Re: [TML] Relic tech and Scarcity-Driven Imperium (was: Salvage Operations (and Submarines)) Michael McKinney (29 Mar 2016 12:44 UTC)

Re: [TML] Relic tech and Scarcity-Driven Imperium (was: Salvage Operations (and Submarines)) Craig Berry (29 Mar 2016 18:46 UTC)

Re: [TML] Relic tech and Scarcity-Driven Imperium (was: Salvage Operations (and Submarines)) Craig Berry (29 Mar 2016 18:37 UTC)

Re: [TML] Relic tech and Scarcity-Driven Imperium (was: Salvage Operations (and Submarines)) Michael McKinney (29 Mar 2016 18:40 UTC)

Re: [TML] Relic tech and Scarcity-Driven Imperium (was: Salvage Operations (and Submarines)) Bruce Johnson (28 Mar 2016 18:22 UTC)

Re: [TML] Relic tech and Scarcity-Driven Imperium (was: Salvage Operations (and Submarines)) Michael McKinney (28 Mar 2016 19:46 UTC)

Re: [TML] Relic tech and Scarcity-Driven Imperium (was: Salvage Operations (and Submarines)) Tim (28 Mar 2016 23:43 UTC)

Re: [TML] Relic tech and Scarcity-Driven Imperium (was: Salvage Operations (and Submarines)) carlos.web@xxxxxx (29 Mar 2016 18:43 UTC)

Re: [TML] Relic tech and Scarcity-Driven Imperium (was: Salvage Operations (and Submarines)) Craig Berry (29 Mar 2016 18:52 UTC)

Re: [TML] Relic tech and Scarcity-Driven Imperium (was: Salvage Operations (and Submarines)) carlos.web@xxxxxx (29 Mar 2016 19:04 UTC)

Re: [TML] Relic tech and Scarcity-Driven Imperium (was: Salvage Operations (and Submarines)) Craig Berry (29 Mar 2016 19:34 UTC)

Re: [TML] Relic tech and Scarcity-Driven Imperium Kelly St. Clair (29 Mar 2016 21:37 UTC)

Re: [TML] Relic tech and Scarcity-Driven Imperium Craig Berry (29 Mar 2016 22:10 UTC)

Re: [TML] Relic tech and Scarcity-Driven Imperium Richard Aiken (30 Mar 2016 04:21 UTC)

Re: [TML] Relic tech and Scarcity-Driven Imperium Greg Chalik (30 Mar 2016 23:49 UTC)

Re: [TML] Relic tech and Scarcity-Driven Imperium Craig Berry (31 Mar 2016 00:02 UTC)

(OT) The Theory of Interstellar Trade carlos.web@xxxxxx (29 Mar 2016 18:58 UTC)

Re: [TML] (OT) The Theory of Interstellar Trade tmr0195@xxxxxx (29 Mar 2016 19:16 UTC)

Re: [TML] (OT) The Theory of Interstellar Trade Michael McKinney (29 Mar 2016 20:32 UTC)

Re: [TML] (OT) The Theory of Interstellar Trade David Shaw (29 Mar 2016 20:55 UTC)

Re: [TML] Relic tech and Scarcity-Driven Imperium (was: Salvage Operations (and Submarines)) Greg Chalik (29 Mar 2016 21:52 UTC)

Re: [TML] Relic tech and Scarcity-Driven Imperium (was: Salvage Operations (and Submarines)) Kelly St. Clair 28 Mar 2016 17:55 UTC

*Common, convenient space travel* implies/requires "cheap, abundant
energy".  Which is why, among other things, we're still mostly stuck at
the bottom of our gravity well, and ship's boats make great WMDs.

A low-energy TU is one where most people don't do much Travelling.
Conversely, a high-energy, high-traffic one is one where the genie is
already well and truly out of the bottle.

--
---------------
Kelly St. Clair
xxxxxx@efn.org