Multiple habitable worlds in system Christopher Sean Hilton (16 Oct 2016 22:30 UTC)
Re: [TML] Multiple habitable worlds in system Evyn MacDude (17 Oct 2016 01:12 UTC)
Re: [TML] Multiple habitable worlds in system Christopher Sean Hilton (17 Oct 2016 03:13 UTC)
Re: [TML] Multiple habitable worlds in system Tim (17 Oct 2016 02:53 UTC)
Re: [TML] Multiple habitable worlds in system Jerry Barrington (17 Oct 2016 09:00 UTC)
Re: [TML] Multiple habitable worlds in system Tim (17 Oct 2016 12:55 UTC)
Re: [TML] Multiple habitable worlds in system Jerry Barrington (17 Oct 2016 18:09 UTC)
Re: [TML] Multiple habitable worlds in system Kelly St. Clair (17 Oct 2016 20:10 UTC)
Re: [TML] Multiple habitable worlds in system C. Berry (17 Oct 2016 20:17 UTC)
Re: [TML] Multiple habitable worlds in system Bruce Johnson (17 Oct 2016 20:26 UTC)
Re: [TML] Multiple habitable worlds in system C. Berry (17 Oct 2016 20:34 UTC)
Re: [TML] Multiple habitable worlds in system Bruce Johnson (17 Oct 2016 20:45 UTC)
Re: [TML] Multiple habitable worlds in system C. Berry (17 Oct 2016 20:52 UTC)
Re: [TML] Multiple habitable worlds in system shadow@xxxxxx (18 Oct 2016 06:24 UTC)
Re: [TML] Multiple habitable worlds in system Jerry Barrington (18 Oct 2016 08:25 UTC)

Re: [TML] Multiple habitable worlds in system shadow@xxxxxx 18 Oct 2016 06:23 UTC

On 17 Oct 2016 at 23:55, Tim wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:00:54AM -0400, Jerry Barrington wrote: >
> Regarding planets around a dim star (or technically *any* multiple >
> system): GM should calculate the blackbody temperature of each >
> planet by summing 278*(L^.25)/(R^.5) for all stars.
>
> Actually they should sum L/R^2, take the fourth root of the sum, and
> multiply by ~278 K.  In most cases this will be very similar to just
> taking the maximum (though always at least slightly greater).

Shouldn't that be -273 K ??? Absolute zero is -273.15 C, isn't it?

--
Leonard Erickson (aka shadow)
shadow at shadowgard dot com