Understanding World Domination. Knapp (01 Feb 2016 13:30 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Neil Mahoney (01 Feb 2016 14:10 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Knapp (01 Feb 2016 14:29 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Kelly St. Clair (01 Feb 2016 15:21 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Knapp (01 Feb 2016 15:48 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Bruce Johnson (01 Feb 2016 15:30 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Knapp (01 Feb 2016 15:51 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Bruce Johnson (01 Feb 2016 16:04 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. shadow@xxxxxx (02 Feb 2016 19:29 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. carlos.web@xxxxxx (01 Feb 2016 17:18 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Bruce Johnson (01 Feb 2016 18:06 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Traveller (01 Feb 2016 18:58 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Knapp (01 Feb 2016 20:20 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Richard Aiken (03 Feb 2016 13:44 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. tmr0195@xxxxxx (01 Feb 2016 22:55 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. carlos.web@xxxxxx (02 Feb 2016 18:51 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. tmr0195@xxxxxx (02 Feb 2016 19:56 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Greg Chalik (02 Feb 2016 20:36 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Bruce Johnson (02 Feb 2016 21:20 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Knapp (02 Feb 2016 21:36 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Greg Chalik (03 Feb 2016 04:32 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Bruce Johnson (02 Feb 2016 20:33 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Knapp (02 Feb 2016 21:23 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. tmr0195@xxxxxx (03 Feb 2016 15:32 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. carlos.web@xxxxxx (04 Feb 2016 12:54 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. tmr0195@xxxxxx (04 Feb 2016 14:11 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Richard Aiken (04 Feb 2016 01:31 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. carlos.web@xxxxxx (04 Feb 2016 13:11 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Greg Chalik (01 Feb 2016 20:35 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Tim (02 Feb 2016 02:00 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Greg Chalik (02 Feb 2016 04:00 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Knapp (02 Feb 2016 21:17 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Knapp (02 Feb 2016 21:15 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Tim (02 Feb 2016 23:52 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Greg Chalik (03 Feb 2016 04:39 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Joseph Paul (02 Feb 2016 18:17 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Greg Chalik (02 Feb 2016 19:10 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Bruce Johnson (02 Feb 2016 19:38 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Knapp (02 Feb 2016 21:25 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Joseph Paul (02 Feb 2016 23:47 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. tmr0195@xxxxxx (03 Feb 2016 01:47 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Greg Chalik (03 Feb 2016 04:44 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Greg Chalik (03 Feb 2016 04:30 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Joseph Paul (03 Feb 2016 14:11 UTC)

Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Bruce Johnson 01 Feb 2016 16:04 UTC

> On Feb 1, 2016, at 8:51 AM, Knapp <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Yes, the just took it. But why not just buy it from the people? Why use mill power when you could use economic and free choice power?

Because military power is ‘free’, in that it must be maintained regardless; also colonies were not taken with the promise of ‘fixing them up’ or ‘giving them cash’.

Colonies are established for three reasons:
1) cheap raw materials for the home country,
2) someplace to send restive, ambitious young nobles or other undesirables,
3) provide a captive market for the home country’s manufactured goods or goods taken from other colonies.

Witness the contretemps regarding tea in Boston, in 1771. England increased import duties on tea on the North American colonies in order to prop up revenues from other English colonies, namely the East India Company, which was a profit stream for wealthy nobles in England.

Follow the money, as always, follow the money.

As again, witness the contretemps regarding tea in Boston, in 1771, which was partly instigated by people with interests in the tea smuggling trade.

Imperialism doesn’t happen because the imperialists want to better the poor countries/planets….

--
Bruce Johnson
University of Arizona
College of Pharmacy
Information Technology Group

Institutions do not have opinions, merely customs