T4 QSDS Question tmr0195@xxxxxx (25 Apr 2015 22:45 UTC)
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question Bruce Johnson (26 Apr 2015 02:05 UTC)
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question tmr0195@xxxxxx (26 Apr 2015 03:33 UTC)
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question Derek Wildstar (28 Apr 2015 16:21 UTC)
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question tmr0195@xxxxxx (28 Apr 2015 22:25 UTC)
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question Derek Wildstar (29 Apr 2015 20:19 UTC)
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question tmr0195@xxxxxx (29 Apr 2015 23:39 UTC)
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question Derek Wildstar (30 Apr 2015 12:58 UTC)
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question tmr0195@xxxxxx (30 Apr 2015 15:35 UTC)
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question Derek Wildstar (30 Apr 2015 21:04 UTC)
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question Ethan McKinney (30 Apr 2015 21:18 UTC)
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question tmr0195@xxxxxx (01 May 2015 02:10 UTC)
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question tmr0195@xxxxxx (01 May 2015 00:01 UTC)
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question Derek Wildstar (01 May 2015 15:49 UTC)
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question tmr0195@xxxxxx (02 May 2015 04:48 UTC)
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors tmr0195@xxxxxx (02 May 2015 15:10 UTC)
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors tmr0195@xxxxxx (03 May 2015 15:52 UTC)
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors tmr0195@xxxxxx (04 May 2015 19:29 UTC)
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors Derek Wildstar (05 May 2015 01:31 UTC)
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors tmr0195@xxxxxx (05 May 2015 06:34 UTC)
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors tmr0195@xxxxxx (05 May 2015 20:43 UTC)
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors Derek Wildstar (05 May 2015 21:22 UTC)
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors tmr0195@xxxxxx (06 May 2015 15:29 UTC)
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors tmr0195@xxxxxx (06 May 2015 20:20 UTC)
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors tmr0195@xxxxxx (07 May 2015 15:45 UTC)
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors Derek Wildstar (07 May 2015 20:34 UTC)
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors tmr0195@xxxxxx (08 May 2015 00:04 UTC)
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors tmr0195@xxxxxx (08 May 2015 03:23 UTC)
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors tmr0195@xxxxxx (08 May 2015 13:40 UTC)
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors Ethan McKinney (09 May 2015 02:50 UTC)
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors tmr0195@xxxxxx (09 May 2015 21:33 UTC)
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors Ethan McKinney (09 May 2015 21:41 UTC)
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors tmr0195@xxxxxx (11 May 2015 18:54 UTC)
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors Ethan McKinney (11 May 2015 19:59 UTC)
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors tmr0195@xxxxxx (11 May 2015 23:48 UTC)
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors Derek Wildstar (05 May 2015 01:26 UTC)
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors tmr0195@xxxxxx (05 May 2015 05:43 UTC)
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors Derek Wildstar (05 May 2015 21:19 UTC)

Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question tmr0195@xxxxxx 02 May 2015 04:47 UTC

Howdy Guy "Derek Wildstar" Garnett,

-----Original Message-----
From: Derek Wildstar
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2015 8:49 AM
To: xxxxxx@simplelists.com
Subject: Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question

On Apr 30, 2015, at 8:01 PM, Tom Rux <xxxxxx@comcast.net> wrote:
>> Until something else comes along I'll continue using the TNE Space Combat
>> hexes which is Range divided by 30,000, which does match the sensor
>> USD entries.

> Sounds good.

At this point I have been successful in matching the crew and USD entries.

>> I have been able to match the TL-9 Improved and Small Military packages
>> using my spreadsheet [...] Unfortunately, the medium military sensor the
>> only items I'm matching are the crew and USD.  I'm going to recheck my
>> numbers and if I can't figure out what is causing the difference I'll be
>> back
>> showing my results.

> Let me know what you find.  Since I don't have any notes or backup on how
> the sensor packages were originally calculated, it is quite possible that
> there are errors in the packages.  The sensor packages are *supposed* to
> follow the TNE FF&S rules, so if we find that we can't make the package
> per
> TNE FF&S, then it is probably an error and needs to be corrected.

> ---Guy "Wildstar" Garnett
> xxxxxx@prismnet.com

I have gone through all four basic packages and improved packages with three
of my basic packages and one improved package not agreeing with QSDS 1.5e.
Of course the TL-9 Improved package has been found not to match the QSDS
cost which is the result of adding the Antenna Cost equation from the
Consolidated TNE Errata. The latest check of the TL-9 Small Military package
has shown not to match the volume and cost.  Hopefully I'll have them all
checked out and be able to post my findings for review on the TML in a
couple of days.

How was the Min Length data determined?

I believe that the min length is referring to the antenna diameters for the
HRT and PEMS which, if I'm on the right track, may need errata. The TL-9 HRT
systems the Passive USD 2 x 30,000 = 60,000 km which the HRT table has the
antenna diameter as 10 m. The QSDS Standard Sensor Table has the min lengt
of 5 m.

Tom Rux